Skip to main content

Homily on heuristic hubris

Humility, Hardwork, Honesty, Honour and Humour

After reading in Jonathan Haidt's wonderful book, The Happiness Hypothesis, about Benjamin Franklin's daily self scoring regime to make himself better practised in behaving virtuously, I have been mulling over how an attention-span-challenged modern like myself might successfully implement a similar system, adapted for our times.

Choosing which of the many possible virtues to measure oneself against is fraught with challenge and all the inherent perils of wanton list making, so my criteria, for the moment, has been reduced to ease of recall in a tight spot, hence a resort to onomatopoeia. I can just remember 5 things, sometimes, so here is my new ready reckoner to arm myself with as I prepare for my daily engagements with my fellow humans. Remind yourself, the 5 aiches:

" humility, hardwork, honesty, honour & humour"

As a boy I was subjected, through a school cadet corps, to the gross stupidities of mass produced military training techniques. One of the more endearingly dumbfounding of the mnemonics our superiors imposed on we putative sentries, were the then famous (and now no doubt long since abandoned) "Five Ss and the M".


This was presumably designed to assist we greenhorns to know what to look for during the tired watches of the night, whilst on sentry duty or reconnaissance, on the basis that we trainees had no prior experience in seeing things and needed pointers to identify what was happening in our field of vision. From memory the "Five Ss" were: "Shape, Surface, Shadow, Silhouette and ....?... (help!) " and the "M" was "Movement". You can see how indelibly this etched itself into my brain. Its principle actual use for we cadets was however the endless other daily rituals or prosaic events to which we could now assign "Five Ss and an M".

My favourite to this day remains our description of how to restore yourself after a hard day's yacca:
"shit, shower, shave, sex, sleep, and a meal".

We riffed on this and other variations endlessly as adolescents. But I have remembered it to this day, so something worked.

If I can now only remember to apply my newly minted "5 Aitches ", in action, half as well as I have applied our favourite mock version of the "Five Ss and the M", I might yet become a better person.


What were those 5 aitches again?
Humiliate, Hardarse, Hollowness, Hypocrisy and Highhandedness".







Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Michael Jackson, martyr ?

. Someone has to die for their beliefs to be a martyr . Drudge pointed to headlines last Friday saying that Jackson's was a " Death by Showbusines s". So in the sense that Jackson seems to have died for his belief in celebrity, yes, he might be called a martyr. I never got Michael Jackson. Thriller didn't thrill me at all ( Now Noel Coward, that's another story ). But I did get a bit of a kick from seeing others get him. He was boppy and catchy and slick, as well as monumentally fluffy and hugely impaired. What I struggle with is the apparently massive consequentiality of fluffiness and impairment like Jackson's. What is the fuss about the passing of a semi-talented song and dance weirdo from decades past? Boris Johnson, the London Mayor, has had a stab at explaining it to we mystified souls who struggle to get with the programme. He reckons it's just like Princess Di. And I agree, to the extent that I was almost as unprepared for and dumbfounded by th...

Bullshit detection is our main AI protection

The volume of chatter in recent online musings about the hydra headed peril of AI dominance, is becoming ear piercing. These piercings will likely support even more garish burbles of thought to dangle decoratively in front of both the curious and accidental victims. A brief diversion - it seems one of the more remarked upon "tells" of the presence of AI in a piece of writing at the moment, is what I now know to call the " Em Dash " (_). Thank you NYT of 18 Sept 2025.  I'll keep an eye out for them. And I'll need to, if I'm to live up to the pleas of the balance of this post. The main subject of this post has been prompted by yet another article that Arts & Letters Daily has pointed me to recently. It's entitled " Large Language Muddle "  and is an editors article from an online magazine called "n+1" published in the Fall of 2025. The central proposition of this muddle piece seems to be that we human authors need to fight back...

The list of "tell"words for LLM speak grows, but these Bots are now teaching us to speak like them ..

According to an article in the Washington Post on 20 August 2025 by Adam Aleksic " people are starting to talk like ChatGTP ".  The previous post here on the Realm pointed to some words that have been nominated as indicators that a Large Language Model (LLM) is the likely author of the piece. According to Mr Aleksic's article we can now add to our list of" delve ", " adept ", " realm " and " meticulous ", the words " intricate " and " commendable ".  As he says elsewhere, it is becoming hard to keep up. But his more telling point is that as LLMs become more and more prevalent contributors in our discourse, it's not just the bots that are using these words, we've all started using them more too; in our own speech.  It seems that the feedback loop from the LLMs gulping up so much of their own outputs when scraping content from the web, is intensifying this linguistic shift.   Aleksic says:  ...  In the two...