Skip to main content

Mad hatter bumps into ceiling at tea party

Whatever toxins may come along with it, the Tea Party movement has been a wonderful example of grass roots democracy in action in the flagship democracy. Citizens holding their overlords in government to account for their sense of entitlement and profligacy with the taxpayers' dime, is an empowering and encouraging prospect.  The Democrats former (and in many cases continuing) moral righteousness about Guantanamo, Global Warming, Iraq, Afghanistan and the well-being of workers, has not been met in office with any actions materially different from the previous Republican administration, even when the Dems controlled both the House and the Senate. Obamacare, the one possible legislative success of Obama's first 2 years, at the moment just looks like an even more gigantic bureaucratic fiscal snafu than usual, at a time when the US can least afford it.


And America seems to have gone morally backwards in many areas under Obama, in spite of all the hope: more wars, more unemployed, more drone killings, gloating over state sponsored assassinations, and continuing glacially paced military trials for enemy combatant detainees in Guantanamo Bay, Cuba.


If, on the other hand, one sensibly sets aside such glib media-packaged morality shtick and concentrates on the hard nosed business of advances in delivering prosperity to and for the people, then the magnitude of the US Federal and State debt problem does look like the serious blockage to meaningful progress. Whatever else may be said about them, the Tea Party seems to have got that part of it pretty much right. Witness the US federal government now bumping up against its previously unimaginably high debt-ceiling of $14 trillion.  Increasing taxes can't reverse the vortex of perpetual hole digging in a blackhole of that magnitude. Tax hikes would only impede the economic growth required to raise enough revenue to just pay the bills. Drastic, painful, socially dislocating spending cuts by a severely overstretched government seem essential if the US is not to become broke. People of responsibility will have to risk being unpopular in the populist republic and be given power by the people, if the US is to have any real chance of prospering again. The EU or China won't bail them out and the IMF is now on remand in Manhattan without bail.


In the meantime the A$ climbs to US$1.06 and more. The commentariat is now even talking here about the US$ halving in value in the early part of this century. My meagre mind goes numb with pain just trying to roughly game out such a scenario for the world's economy. And though Australia's prosperity is now inextricable linked to China's seemingly unquenchable thirst for its primary resources, we need the US to start growing vigorously again for the world to prosper. A return to high inflation now looks almost inevitable in the next decade in the US under current FED monetary settings. This might help ameliorate the debt problems, but the other consequences could be dire. Yes, interesting times. Buy gold?

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Michael Jackson, martyr ?

. Someone has to die for their beliefs to be a martyr . Drudge pointed to headlines last Friday saying that Jackson's was a " Death by Showbusines s". So in the sense that Jackson seems to have died for his belief in celebrity, yes, he might be called a martyr. I never got Michael Jackson. Thriller didn't thrill me at all ( Now Noel Coward, that's another story ). But I did get a bit of a kick from seeing others get him. He was boppy and catchy and slick, as well as monumentally fluffy and hugely impaired. What I struggle with is the apparently massive consequentiality of fluffiness and impairment like Jackson's. What is the fuss about the passing of a semi-talented song and dance weirdo from decades past? Boris Johnson, the London Mayor, has had a stab at explaining it to we mystified souls who struggle to get with the programme. He reckons it's just like Princess Di. And I agree, to the extent that I was almost as unprepared for and dumbfounded by th...

Bullshit detection is our main AI protection

The volume of chatter in recent online musings about the hydra headed peril of AI dominance, is becoming ear piercing. These piercings will likely support even more garish burbles of thought to dangle decoratively in front of both the curious and accidental victims. A brief diversion - it seems one of the more remarked upon "tells" of the presence of AI in a piece of writing at the moment, is what I now know to call the " Em Dash " (_). Thank you NYT of 18 Sept 2025.  I'll keep an eye out for them. And I'll need to, if I'm to live up to the pleas of the balance of this post. The main subject of this post has been prompted by yet another article that Arts & Letters Daily has pointed me to recently. It's entitled " Large Language Muddle "  and is an editors article from an online magazine called "n+1" published in the Fall of 2025. The central proposition of this muddle piece seems to be that we human authors need to fight back...

The list of "tell"words for LLM speak grows, but these Bots are now teaching us to speak like them ..

According to an article in the Washington Post on 20 August 2025 by Adam Aleksic " people are starting to talk like ChatGTP ".  The previous post here on the Realm pointed to some words that have been nominated as indicators that a Large Language Model (LLM) is the likely author of the piece. According to Mr Aleksic's article we can now add to our list of" delve ", " adept ", " realm " and " meticulous ", the words " intricate " and " commendable ".  As he says elsewhere, it is becoming hard to keep up. But his more telling point is that as LLMs become more and more prevalent contributors in our discourse, it's not just the bots that are using these words, we've all started using them more too; in our own speech.  It seems that the feedback loop from the LLMs gulping up so much of their own outputs when scraping content from the web, is intensifying this linguistic shift.   Aleksic says:  ...  In the two...